I don't know how anyone can watch this and think that anything resembling a real debate is happening.
(Via MNPP)
Friday, August 14, 2009
Monday, July 13, 2009
Once upon a time in 2007....
Once upon a time, back in March of 2007, I was working on opening the Iowa Independent for the Center for Independent Media. It was very early spring...I had quite literally just turned 30 4 days earlier, and I was in a hotel in Des Moines interviewing people to be the Managing Editor of the new site.
Sitting in Iowa in 2007, looking for people to work for a politics-focused blog, one of the first things you're going to discuss is what is happening with the caucuses. It was still 10 months until caucus day (maybe more -- I can't remember the real timing of the original, pre-leapfrog caucus date). However, we were already 4 months into heavy campaigning thanks to Iowa's governor jump starting the process less than 4 weeks after the 2006 election.
If I remember right, Vilsack had just dropped out of the running. The general consensus with most Iowans I met was that he was urged to enter the race, and enter it very early, in order to help the Clinton campaign. The Clinton campaign was believed by many to think the nomination would be won by whoever had the most money to spend. It was assumed that the combined fundraising power of a New York Senator/former First Lady and the former President of the United States would be totally dominant, and the longer the race lasted, the more expensive it would be. Since announcing first, especially that early, would be too obvious, Vilsack was allegedly talked into being the stalking horse that would force the rest of the candidates to declare.
In March of 2007, it seemed like an excellent plan. Clinton had the very early positioning of the front-runner status. She had a very loyal base. She quickly became the one to beat. And with her name recognition, her endless pool of money, and her early mobilization of supporters, she pretty quickly ended up with the mantle of inevitability. Sure there were some problems. The people who liked her really liked her, but the people who didn't? Let's say there were some pretty high negatives involved. Some were rational, others, not so much.
As the primaries continued, it only got worse. Probably the true death knell of her candidacy was the Michigan primary, where she left her name on the ballot. Sure, she played exactly by the rules, but for a lot of people it just didn't seem exactly fair or right somehow. For her supporters, they didn't understand why other people were upset since they were simply campaigning and running. But for those who didn't support her, the wedge was deeper, and the negatives grew.
Clinton's campaign was right about one thing -- it was a long campaign, and the person with the most money won. But no one expected that a relative political newcomer could ever raise the kind of funds he did. They also underestimated the desire many people had to see a new name in the running for office. After so many years of Clinton and Bush White Houses and the same names and faces running over and over again for different positions, "change" became mostly a desire to see someone new do (hopefully) something different.
I'd been working on this post ever since Fecke put up his Entenza piece, because I see a lot of parallels between Matt Entenza and the early Clinton campaign. Both candidates were seen as early on favorites due to finances, name recognition, and, in some ways, by this weird political idea of "it's my turn." Both candidates had extremely high positives, but for those who didn't like them, they REALLY didn't like them. Both have done things in campaigns that weren't necessarily officially unethical, but could be seen by their dissenters and coming dangerously near the line if not crossing it. Both were running early, long campaigns at a time when, let's be honest, a democrat really should have an excellent chance to win.
There are a few large differences, though. The most significant is that in a national election, a third party candidate is usually not that much of a factor (yes, 2000 aside). But we lost the governor's house in 2006 in part because the Independence Party ran a candidate who was often more progressive than the DFL's own nominee. Minnesotans do not just hold their nose and party vote. If they did, we probably wouldn't have just sworn in a senator last week.
Is Matt Entenza the most winnable candidate running right now? Perhaps. He certainly has more name recognition, money and staff than the others involved. For those who gauge a political race on weighing those factors then yes, he probably would be the inevitable candidate.
But we are still 16 months before the election. We are still almost a year until we even have a nominating convention. There are more candidates to declare, and, much of the "he's ahead, don't talk about negatives" talk seems to be a push to keep the "inevitable" meme in place so these candidates don't run.
From the point in which I started drafting this post to now, Fecke once again nailed it with this piece about inevitability. Inevitability is a game you play when you are trying to keep the race exactly as it is at this moment. Inevitability is a fear of change in circumstances.
16 months is a long time in real life, and an even longer time in politics. The trend of ridiculously long campaigns that start less than two months after the last election may be a boon for those of us who are peripherally involved in politics, but have the disadvantage of making people want to declare races over before they even begin. The only thing inevitable at this point is that there are many, many months before we will have a candidate, and hopefully that candidate will be decided on by the strength of her or his stances on bettering our state, and not on who has the most money or their communications team organized the earliest.
(Note: I think I have made it no secret that I am hoping to support a female, pro-choice gubernatorial candidate. But in case you have somehow missed that about me, go here.)
Sitting in Iowa in 2007, looking for people to work for a politics-focused blog, one of the first things you're going to discuss is what is happening with the caucuses. It was still 10 months until caucus day (maybe more -- I can't remember the real timing of the original, pre-leapfrog caucus date). However, we were already 4 months into heavy campaigning thanks to Iowa's governor jump starting the process less than 4 weeks after the 2006 election.
If I remember right, Vilsack had just dropped out of the running. The general consensus with most Iowans I met was that he was urged to enter the race, and enter it very early, in order to help the Clinton campaign. The Clinton campaign was believed by many to think the nomination would be won by whoever had the most money to spend. It was assumed that the combined fundraising power of a New York Senator/former First Lady and the former President of the United States would be totally dominant, and the longer the race lasted, the more expensive it would be. Since announcing first, especially that early, would be too obvious, Vilsack was allegedly talked into being the stalking horse that would force the rest of the candidates to declare.
In March of 2007, it seemed like an excellent plan. Clinton had the very early positioning of the front-runner status. She had a very loyal base. She quickly became the one to beat. And with her name recognition, her endless pool of money, and her early mobilization of supporters, she pretty quickly ended up with the mantle of inevitability. Sure there were some problems. The people who liked her really liked her, but the people who didn't? Let's say there were some pretty high negatives involved. Some were rational, others, not so much.
As the primaries continued, it only got worse. Probably the true death knell of her candidacy was the Michigan primary, where she left her name on the ballot. Sure, she played exactly by the rules, but for a lot of people it just didn't seem exactly fair or right somehow. For her supporters, they didn't understand why other people were upset since they were simply campaigning and running. But for those who didn't support her, the wedge was deeper, and the negatives grew.
Clinton's campaign was right about one thing -- it was a long campaign, and the person with the most money won. But no one expected that a relative political newcomer could ever raise the kind of funds he did. They also underestimated the desire many people had to see a new name in the running for office. After so many years of Clinton and Bush White Houses and the same names and faces running over and over again for different positions, "change" became mostly a desire to see someone new do (hopefully) something different.
I'd been working on this post ever since Fecke put up his Entenza piece, because I see a lot of parallels between Matt Entenza and the early Clinton campaign. Both candidates were seen as early on favorites due to finances, name recognition, and, in some ways, by this weird political idea of "it's my turn." Both candidates had extremely high positives, but for those who didn't like them, they REALLY didn't like them. Both have done things in campaigns that weren't necessarily officially unethical, but could be seen by their dissenters and coming dangerously near the line if not crossing it. Both were running early, long campaigns at a time when, let's be honest, a democrat really should have an excellent chance to win.
There are a few large differences, though. The most significant is that in a national election, a third party candidate is usually not that much of a factor (yes, 2000 aside). But we lost the governor's house in 2006 in part because the Independence Party ran a candidate who was often more progressive than the DFL's own nominee. Minnesotans do not just hold their nose and party vote. If they did, we probably wouldn't have just sworn in a senator last week.
Is Matt Entenza the most winnable candidate running right now? Perhaps. He certainly has more name recognition, money and staff than the others involved. For those who gauge a political race on weighing those factors then yes, he probably would be the inevitable candidate.
But we are still 16 months before the election. We are still almost a year until we even have a nominating convention. There are more candidates to declare, and, much of the "he's ahead, don't talk about negatives" talk seems to be a push to keep the "inevitable" meme in place so these candidates don't run.
From the point in which I started drafting this post to now, Fecke once again nailed it with this piece about inevitability. Inevitability is a game you play when you are trying to keep the race exactly as it is at this moment. Inevitability is a fear of change in circumstances.
16 months is a long time in real life, and an even longer time in politics. The trend of ridiculously long campaigns that start less than two months after the last election may be a boon for those of us who are peripherally involved in politics, but have the disadvantage of making people want to declare races over before they even begin. The only thing inevitable at this point is that there are many, many months before we will have a candidate, and hopefully that candidate will be decided on by the strength of her or his stances on bettering our state, and not on who has the most money or their communications team organized the earliest.
(Note: I think I have made it no secret that I am hoping to support a female, pro-choice gubernatorial candidate. But in case you have somehow missed that about me, go here.)
Wednesday, July 01, 2009
A long, long time
On February 27th, 2007, Al Franken dropped by Drinking Liberally. Shortly thereafter, he sent me this note.
858 days later, Franken was certified the winner of the Minnesota Senate election of 2008.
Congratulations, Senator Elect Franken. I hope you've been having as much fun all 867 days as you were the first 31.
858 days later, Franken was certified the winner of the Minnesota Senate election of 2008.
Congratulations, Senator Elect Franken. I hope you've been having as much fun all 867 days as you were the first 31.
Friday, June 19, 2009
Regarding the Ward 1 City Council Coverage
It's been mentioned around the blogs that I haven't been keeping up the Ward 1 city council coverage since the endorsement convention ended. Frankly, I haven't seen the need to do more stories because to me, there has been no news. Doron Clark and Jose Velez ended the convention asking for the delegates to endorse Kevin Reich unanimously, which we all did. Although Susan Howitz Hanna is still in the race, she has yet to even put up a website, much less do any active campaigning that I can see (and I did email her after the convention asking her to keep me in the loop so that I can stay on top of any potential campaign). To me, there is just no news, and I'm not a blogger who will grasp at straws or do rehashes and what might have beens just to fill my pages.
And as for park board, I am fully behind my neighbor Liz.
I understand there is a new ward 1 blog in town, and I welcome all of you to go read it. I won't be covering the race unless until there is actual news to write about.
And as for park board, I am fully behind my neighbor Liz.
I understand there is a new ward 1 blog in town, and I welcome all of you to go read it. I won't be covering the race unless until there is actual news to write about.
Thursday, June 04, 2009
Long time no blog
Sorry for the dead blog. I'm working on a new project that I hope to be unveiling soon. In the meantime, I microblog, if you are interested, on twitter.
Thursday, March 26, 2009
Video from Velez
Ok, I know I said that I was supporting Clark. But I still appreciate good outreach, and this is, as far as I know, the first Video message to go out in the Ward 1 race. And I like it! I wish more candidates did these, they really get personality through.
Monday, March 16, 2009
Doron Clark for Ward 1
Having finally spoken to all of the candidates, I have made a decision to support Doron Clark for city council, and will be voting for him on the first ballot. Although I was a huge fan of Jose Velez, I believe in the end that Doron has an energy, an enthusiasm and a determination that puts him just ahead of Jose and through that one my support.
It was a very difficult decision to come to. Frankly, after meeting Jose for coffee a few weeks ago I was ready not just to vote for him, but to ask him for a job as well. His vision for the community was compelling and I wanted to be a part of it.
But I feel both men are equally qualified. Endorsements began to matter more to me, and then intangibles became a bigger and bigger factor.
Friday morning, I found a note in my door that Doron had stopped by door knocking the night before. Saturday, I found him at my door again. I was letting in a group of women for a bachelorette party I was hosting and he was on my doorstep. I offered him an anatomically correct cookie, and he pointed out to the women entering that he was, in fact, not the stripper for the party. I introduced him to one woman and said "She's in your district, too."
"I'm Doron Clark and I'm running for City Council," he said, offering his hand to shake.
Not many people can wander into a situation like that and be completely unphased. If he has that kind of calm and humor in the face of the unexpected, I think he will do wonderfully handling big personalities, budget crises and other calamities in the office.
So today, I am happy to announce myself as a supporter, and hope you will consider supporting him as well.
It was a very difficult decision to come to. Frankly, after meeting Jose for coffee a few weeks ago I was ready not just to vote for him, but to ask him for a job as well. His vision for the community was compelling and I wanted to be a part of it.
But I feel both men are equally qualified. Endorsements began to matter more to me, and then intangibles became a bigger and bigger factor.
Friday morning, I found a note in my door that Doron had stopped by door knocking the night before. Saturday, I found him at my door again. I was letting in a group of women for a bachelorette party I was hosting and he was on my doorstep. I offered him an anatomically correct cookie, and he pointed out to the women entering that he was, in fact, not the stripper for the party. I introduced him to one woman and said "She's in your district, too."
"I'm Doron Clark and I'm running for City Council," he said, offering his hand to shake.
Not many people can wander into a situation like that and be completely unphased. If he has that kind of calm and humor in the face of the unexpected, I think he will do wonderfully handling big personalities, budget crises and other calamities in the office.
So today, I am happy to announce myself as a supporter, and hope you will consider supporting him as well.
Thursday, March 12, 2009
Ward 1 update
Sorry about the low posting, but it's been surprisingly quiet since caucus. I've had no contact from the Clark campaign. Reich has friended me on facebook and sent me a list of upcoming house parties. In fact, the only one who's done any real outreach to me so far has been the Velez campaign, with Jose calling two days ago and Rosemary calling tonight. I think I will be making a houseparty on the 25th, and I will try to hit a Reich coffee at Audubon this Sunday, assuming my bachelorette party isn't too rambunctious the night before.
More council thoughts after those, I think.
More council thoughts after those, I think.
Thursday, March 05, 2009
Reversing the economic downturn -- Solution 1
I've been thinking a lot about the economy lately, like most people no doubt. So periodically over the next few days I'll be putting out alternate 'bailout' ideas. This first one came today via email:
I think it would work, but then again, I just really want to sell my house and get something bigger.
The main problem right now is that we're in a constant downward spiral of decreasing spending -> job losses -> foreclosures -> repeat. Right? If we could break that cycle we could at least bottom out the market and then start working our way back up. So....
The government should pay to the banks the value of 25% of all mortgages originated or refinanced from late 2001 to late 2007 (or whatever the bubble years were). In return for this money, the banks agree to reduce all of these mortgages by 25%. That's it.
The conservatives are happy because the government takes no ownership stake in the banks or the mortgages or anything else. Other than this one action they stay out of the market. The liberals are happy because this gives direct benefit to the middle class. The banks get a bunch of capital to pad their bottom line and extend credit. Most importantly, homeowners get relief in the form of lowered mortgages payments so fewer of them go into foreclosure and those who weren't near foreclosure get a little extra money each month to spend or save as they see fit. Also, this puts the value of houses a little closer to their true value which helps to stabilize the housing market a bit and also allows at least some current homeowners the chance to unload their current properties and buy a new house without taking a major loss.
The only major downsides I can see are that it would cost a ton of money and it would end up rewarding some bad behavior from people who took out loans they couldn't afford, but both of those downsides are inevitable parts of every equation. The reason my solution is different is that it's forward thinking-instead of just giving money to banks to offset toxic asset write offs (due to foreclosure) it stabilizes the banks *and* the homeowners so that foreclosures stop happening and then banks don't need to continue writing off toxic assets.
So, brilliant or simplistic? What do you think?
I think it would work, but then again, I just really want to sell my house and get something bigger.
Suffering for beauty
The theory is being tossed out that VP candidate Sarah Palin was handicapped by her beauty, as there are no smart and beautiful women. Personally, I assume people questioned her intelligence because of media interviews, but that's just me.
So, are all sexy women considered less intelligent? Are there no smart hotties in government?
I think if we look around a little we can find some...
So, are all sexy women considered less intelligent? Are there no smart hotties in government?
I think if we look around a little we can find some...
Standing on the corner, waiting for the bus...
I have a weird car phobia. I'm not sure why, but I utterly hate the idea of driving. Maybe it's because I know I have a habit of distractability, or maybe it's the fact that I really don't like things that go fast (I hated skiing, I use my brakes biking down hills, and I'm a poke on gocarts). So far, I've managed to avoid a drivers license thanks to decent public transportation. And being a one car household is nice, especially when that car is paid for and under warranty for another 5 years.
So needless to say, when I was told that because of the plans to pull down the railyard bridge in Columbia Park the #11 was going to be in trouble, I worried quite a bit.
For those who don't know the neighborhood, we're sandwiched in between University and the railyard. We're about 5 blocks wide and 5 blocks long. We have a lovely park at one end, and the other end is the Minneapolis boarder. Because we are so cut off, we have little through traffic, and mostly quite streets. And, for a transit lover like me, the #11 comes through it fairly regularly, stopping a block from my house, and goes downtown where you can hook up with pretty much any bus you need. It's not a frequent bus, like you can get on the big routes, but if you plan right it's usually mostly convenient, running every 20 minutes during rush hour and half hour off rush, Monday through Friday. It gets harder on the weekend, when it's only every hour. And, as I discovered one Saturday night, it doesn't go all the way home after 11pm, dropping me about two miles from my house at 12am after girl's night.
Still, it does the job, and really, it's all we have unless you count an express bus that runs 6 times a day M-F, three times in the morning and three times at night.
It didn't occur to me when they were making plans for the bridge that the bus would no longer be able to run. Luckily, someone who went to the meeting emailed me, and I was able to contact Jack Yuzna, who today sent me an email assuring me that the route, although it will be moved, will continue running.
This is a huge relief not just to me, but to many in my neighborhood. Many people here have more people than cars, or are trying to keep their costs down in ways that make the bus a good choice for them. And frequently the bus is taken by the elderly in my neighborhood, who would not have the ability to walk the 3/4ths of a mile it would take to get to Central, the next nearest route.
I'm told that there will be a public discussion about the detour, and I will continue to make sure that details of the meeting get out into the public. At this point, the most logical choice would be to reroute onto University, making a stop at 37th, then turn, perhaps on Lowry, although that still leaves out a lot of people on the other side of the bridge.
If you have rerouting suggestions, I would love to compile them to have to present once a public meeting is set. Ensuring buss access to our neighborhood is a huge priority to me.
However, just in case, I suppose I should work on getting over this car phobia and getting my license.
So needless to say, when I was told that because of the plans to pull down the railyard bridge in Columbia Park the #11 was going to be in trouble, I worried quite a bit.
For those who don't know the neighborhood, we're sandwiched in between University and the railyard. We're about 5 blocks wide and 5 blocks long. We have a lovely park at one end, and the other end is the Minneapolis boarder. Because we are so cut off, we have little through traffic, and mostly quite streets. And, for a transit lover like me, the #11 comes through it fairly regularly, stopping a block from my house, and goes downtown where you can hook up with pretty much any bus you need. It's not a frequent bus, like you can get on the big routes, but if you plan right it's usually mostly convenient, running every 20 minutes during rush hour and half hour off rush, Monday through Friday. It gets harder on the weekend, when it's only every hour. And, as I discovered one Saturday night, it doesn't go all the way home after 11pm, dropping me about two miles from my house at 12am after girl's night.
Still, it does the job, and really, it's all we have unless you count an express bus that runs 6 times a day M-F, three times in the morning and three times at night.
It didn't occur to me when they were making plans for the bridge that the bus would no longer be able to run. Luckily, someone who went to the meeting emailed me, and I was able to contact Jack Yuzna, who today sent me an email assuring me that the route, although it will be moved, will continue running.
This is a huge relief not just to me, but to many in my neighborhood. Many people here have more people than cars, or are trying to keep their costs down in ways that make the bus a good choice for them. And frequently the bus is taken by the elderly in my neighborhood, who would not have the ability to walk the 3/4ths of a mile it would take to get to Central, the next nearest route.
I'm told that there will be a public discussion about the detour, and I will continue to make sure that details of the meeting get out into the public. At this point, the most logical choice would be to reroute onto University, making a stop at 37th, then turn, perhaps on Lowry, although that still leaves out a lot of people on the other side of the bridge.
If you have rerouting suggestions, I would love to compile them to have to present once a public meeting is set. Ensuring buss access to our neighborhood is a huge priority to me.
However, just in case, I suppose I should work on getting over this car phobia and getting my license.
Wednesday, March 04, 2009
Post caucus wrap up
So I was surprised, delighted and a little upset honestly to find out that we had more people/letters than spots to the ward convention in our precinct (upset because as an assistant precinct captain, that makes things harder). We managed to work everything out due to a whole lot of MN nice, and avoided having to subcaucus. I wonder how much of democracy is really about drawing names out of hats...
I'm glad we didn't have to subcaucus because frankly, after seeing all 4 candidates speak, I'm more torn. I liked Kevin Reich as a speaker a great deal. I'm hoping to get to talk to him one on one before the convention. Velez came off as the most uncomfortable speaker, although I think he started in our room so maybe he warmed up as he went. Clark was poised and well versed in his stump.
I was annoyed by Susan Howitz Hanna. Please don't come into a room of neighborhood activists who met to participate in their government and say that you are there to represent the people who don't like to show up or get involved. It's one thing to work to represent everyone in your community. But emphasizing that you want to represent the other folks isn't going to win over the active participants.
I think there were a lot of Reich supporters in my room. I saw a lot of buttons.
So, still decisions to be made, but I feel like there is still enough time to make it well informed.
I'm glad we didn't have to subcaucus because frankly, after seeing all 4 candidates speak, I'm more torn. I liked Kevin Reich as a speaker a great deal. I'm hoping to get to talk to him one on one before the convention. Velez came off as the most uncomfortable speaker, although I think he started in our room so maybe he warmed up as he went. Clark was poised and well versed in his stump.
I was annoyed by Susan Howitz Hanna. Please don't come into a room of neighborhood activists who met to participate in their government and say that you are there to represent the people who don't like to show up or get involved. It's one thing to work to represent everyone in your community. But emphasizing that you want to represent the other folks isn't going to win over the active participants.
I think there were a lot of Reich supporters in my room. I saw a lot of buttons.
So, still decisions to be made, but I feel like there is still enough time to make it well informed.
Monday, March 02, 2009
Ward 1 Final Thoughts
It's the night before caucus, and the endorsements appear to be flying left and right. Clark just recently received Stonewall DFL and ACORN, and Velez's endorsement by the Minneapolis Building and Construction Trades Council. It seems like mow is the time for reflecting, and so I have been.
In all honesty, it's been most likely a two person race in my head for a bit. Although I greatly enjoyed talking with Susan Howitz Hanna, and as much as I feel I should support a woman candidate, I just don't feel like she has put the thought and effort into her campaign that the others have. I know that she has only recently entered the race, but I don't get a strong grasp of what she is running for, other than because people have asked. Our ward and our city will be going through some very trying times. I need more from her than what I am seeing.
I still have not had a chance to talk to Reich. That's primarily my fault. Frankly, I was already having a very hard time deciding between Clark and Velez. I don't think I really wanted another person in the mix. Possibly that was what made me less open to Hanna as well, but I still feel pretty sure about my decision regarding her.
So that leaves two.
I have a list of pros and cons for both Velez and Clark. And I have been going back and forth for about a week now. I intended to list everything until I realized that my issue right now is that when I was done meeting with Clark I thought he was a person I'd like to sit down and discuss politics and the city's issues with. When I was done meeting with Velez, I was half tempted to ask him for a job.
I'm really enthused about both candidates. I think they would both make great city council members. But when it comes down to it, I can't make a decision yet, and I don't think I'm ready to. I need more time to see them campaign. And I want to see what Take Action Minnesota thinks. There are still a lot of people on the fence and I've decided I don't have to feel guilty about being one of them.
So I'm going to caucus undecided tomorrow. Hopefully I will see you all there.
In all honesty, it's been most likely a two person race in my head for a bit. Although I greatly enjoyed talking with Susan Howitz Hanna, and as much as I feel I should support a woman candidate, I just don't feel like she has put the thought and effort into her campaign that the others have. I know that she has only recently entered the race, but I don't get a strong grasp of what she is running for, other than because people have asked. Our ward and our city will be going through some very trying times. I need more from her than what I am seeing.
I still have not had a chance to talk to Reich. That's primarily my fault. Frankly, I was already having a very hard time deciding between Clark and Velez. I don't think I really wanted another person in the mix. Possibly that was what made me less open to Hanna as well, but I still feel pretty sure about my decision regarding her.
So that leaves two.
I have a list of pros and cons for both Velez and Clark. And I have been going back and forth for about a week now. I intended to list everything until I realized that my issue right now is that when I was done meeting with Clark I thought he was a person I'd like to sit down and discuss politics and the city's issues with. When I was done meeting with Velez, I was half tempted to ask him for a job.
I'm really enthused about both candidates. I think they would both make great city council members. But when it comes down to it, I can't make a decision yet, and I don't think I'm ready to. I need more time to see them campaign. And I want to see what Take Action Minnesota thinks. There are still a lot of people on the fence and I've decided I don't have to feel guilty about being one of them.
So I'm going to caucus undecided tomorrow. Hopefully I will see you all there.
Velez endorsed by Minneapolis Building and Construction Trades Council
For Immediate Release
Minneapolis Building Trades Announces Endorsements for Minneapolis City Offices
Minneapolis, Minnesota (March 2, 2009) The Minneapolis Building and Construction Trades Council is proud to announce the following endorsements for Minneapolis City Council, Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board, and Minneapolis Board of Estimate and Taxation.
Mayor
RT Rybak
City Council
Ward 1 Jose Velez
Ward 2 Cam Gordon
Ward 3 Diane Hofstede
Ward 4 Barb Johnson
Ward 6 Robert Lilligren
Ward 7 Lisa Goodman
Ward 8 Elizabeth Glidden
Ward 9 Gary Schiff
Ward 10 Lara Norkus-Crampton
Ward 11 John Quincy
Ward 12 Sandy Colvin-Roy
Ward 13 Betsy Hodges
Park Board
District 1 Michael Rainville
District 2 Jon Olson
District 3 Scott Vreeland
District 4 Tracy Nordstrom
District 5 Marty Demgen
District 6 Bob Fine
At-Large John Erwin
At-Large Tom Nordyke
At-Large Annie Young
Board of Estimate and Taxation
Carol Becker
Sean Broom
Our endorsement committee, comprised of representatives of our affiliated unions, voted unanimously to endorse this slate of current and future city leaders. We look forward to working with them to build a city that has a sustainable economy and infrastructure.
ABOUT THE MINNEAPOLIS BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL
The Minneapolis Building and Construction Trades Council and its affiliates represent nearly 30,000 union construction workers. Our affiliates represent construction workers as well as employees who work for the City of Minneapolis and the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board. Together, we are building better communities everyday!
###
Minneapolis Building Trades Announces Endorsements for Minneapolis City Offices
Minneapolis, Minnesota (March 2, 2009) The Minneapolis Building and Construction Trades Council is proud to announce the following endorsements for Minneapolis City Council, Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board, and Minneapolis Board of Estimate and Taxation.
Mayor
RT Rybak
City Council
Ward 1 Jose Velez
Ward 2 Cam Gordon
Ward 3 Diane Hofstede
Ward 4 Barb Johnson
Ward 6 Robert Lilligren
Ward 7 Lisa Goodman
Ward 8 Elizabeth Glidden
Ward 9 Gary Schiff
Ward 10 Lara Norkus-Crampton
Ward 11 John Quincy
Ward 12 Sandy Colvin-Roy
Ward 13 Betsy Hodges
Park Board
District 1 Michael Rainville
District 2 Jon Olson
District 3 Scott Vreeland
District 4 Tracy Nordstrom
District 5 Marty Demgen
District 6 Bob Fine
At-Large John Erwin
At-Large Tom Nordyke
At-Large Annie Young
Board of Estimate and Taxation
Carol Becker
Sean Broom
Our endorsement committee, comprised of representatives of our affiliated unions, voted unanimously to endorse this slate of current and future city leaders. We look forward to working with them to build a city that has a sustainable economy and infrastructure.
ABOUT THE MINNEAPOLIS BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL
The Minneapolis Building and Construction Trades Council and its affiliates represent nearly 30,000 union construction workers. Our affiliates represent construction workers as well as employees who work for the City of Minneapolis and the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board. Together, we are building better communities everyday!
###
ACORN endorses Doron Clark
I hope to do my thoughts later tonight, but the baby is sick again so I'm having issues getting it done. In the meantime, another Clark endorsement---
For Immediate Release: March 2nd, 2009
Contacts: Sunday Alabi, APAC Chair 612.860.5520
A Nurack, Head Organizer 515.664.6691
Minnesota ACORN PAC Endorses Slate of Candidates
Minneapolis candidates commit to fight for working families
Minneapolis, Minn. - Members of Minnesota ACORN Political Action Committee endorsed a slate of candidates for Mayor and city council in Minneapolis. The endorsements come a day before the March 3rd precinct caucuses and sets the candidates on the path to win critical support from other organizations that work for social justice.
ACORN PAC's Endorsed Candidates:
Mayor: RT Rybak
City Council:
Ward 1 - Doron Clark
Ward 5 - Don Samuels
Ward 6 - Robert Lilligren
Ward 9 - Gary Schiff
Ward 10 - Matt Filner
Ward 11 - John Quincy
"These candidates are committed to fighting for working families," said Sunday Alabi, the Chair of ACORN's Political Action Committee. "From fighting predatory lenders and preventing foreclosures to creating living wage jobs and workplace dignity, these candidates have worked hard to help low and moderate income communities. We're proud to send them to City Hall."
Winning the endorsement of an organization that serves low- and moderate-income communities and addresses issues such as affordable housing, health care, and poverty may help the candidates gain the endorsement of the Democratic Farmer-Labor Party.
The ACORN Political Action Committee is a voluntary organization established by members of ACORN, a grassroots community organization of low and moderate income families. ACORN PAC organizes our communities to support candidates who will stand up for the interests of low and moderate income people.
757 Raymond Ave., #200 St. Paul, MN 55114 -
(651) 642-9639 (651) 642-0060 fax -
mnacorn@acorn.org
For Immediate Release: March 2nd, 2009
Contacts: Sunday Alabi, APAC Chair 612.860.5520
A Nurack, Head Organizer 515.664.6691
Minnesota ACORN PAC Endorses Slate of Candidates
Minneapolis candidates commit to fight for working families
Minneapolis, Minn. - Members of Minnesota ACORN Political Action Committee endorsed a slate of candidates for Mayor and city council in Minneapolis. The endorsements come a day before the March 3rd precinct caucuses and sets the candidates on the path to win critical support from other organizations that work for social justice.
ACORN PAC's Endorsed Candidates:
Mayor: RT Rybak
City Council:
Ward 1 - Doron Clark
Ward 5 - Don Samuels
Ward 6 - Robert Lilligren
Ward 9 - Gary Schiff
Ward 10 - Matt Filner
Ward 11 - John Quincy
"These candidates are committed to fighting for working families," said Sunday Alabi, the Chair of ACORN's Political Action Committee. "From fighting predatory lenders and preventing foreclosures to creating living wage jobs and workplace dignity, these candidates have worked hard to help low and moderate income communities. We're proud to send them to City Hall."
Winning the endorsement of an organization that serves low- and moderate-income communities and addresses issues such as affordable housing, health care, and poverty may help the candidates gain the endorsement of the Democratic Farmer-Labor Party.
The ACORN Political Action Committee is a voluntary organization established by members of ACORN, a grassroots community organization of low and moderate income families. ACORN PAC organizes our communities to support candidates who will stand up for the interests of low and moderate income people.
757 Raymond Ave., #200 St. Paul, MN 55114 -
(651) 642-9639 (651) 642-0060 fax -
mnacorn@acorn.org
Doron Clark gets Stonewall Endorsement
Stonewall DFL Endorses Doron Clark
Clark Picking Up Steam Heading into March 3rd Caucuses
Today, Stonewall DFL announced its endorsement of Doron Clark. "I'm honored by Stonewall DFL's endorsement," Clark stated in accepting the group's endorsement. "I fundamentally believe that basic civil rights must be extended to all members of the GLBT community."
Clark's campaign manager, Nolan Pitlick added, "Stonewall DFL thoughtfully considers all candidates in a race. Their endorsement shows the depth of knowledge Doron holds on a diverse spectrum of topics."
The endorsement gives the Doron Clark campaign critical momentum heading into the March 3rd DFL caucuses.
Broad Support for Doron Clark
Stonewall DFL's endorsement joins the endorsement of AFSCME, Minnesota's second largest union; neighborhood presidents Jeffrey Kraker (Logan Park), Jeffrey Martin (Waite Park), and Wendy Menken (SE Como); and hundreds of supporters.
Click here to learn more about caucuses
including what to do if you cannot attend
You Can Help!
Doron's needs your help to win!
* Caucus for Clark on March 3rd at Northeast Middle School (7:00 pm)
* Become a volunteer! If you have 30 minutes, you can help. Email volunteer@DoronClark.com to help.
*
Facebook Fan Page
* Donate!Can you help today with a gift of $30, $60, or even $300?
www.DoronClark.com
Prepared & Paid for by Neighbors for Doron Clark; Dean DeGroot, Treasurer
1914 Ulysses St. NE
Minneapolis, MN 55418
Clark Picking Up Steam Heading into March 3rd Caucuses
Today, Stonewall DFL announced its endorsement of Doron Clark. "I'm honored by Stonewall DFL's endorsement," Clark stated in accepting the group's endorsement. "I fundamentally believe that basic civil rights must be extended to all members of the GLBT community."
Clark's campaign manager, Nolan Pitlick added, "Stonewall DFL thoughtfully considers all candidates in a race. Their endorsement shows the depth of knowledge Doron holds on a diverse spectrum of topics."
The endorsement gives the Doron Clark campaign critical momentum heading into the March 3rd DFL caucuses.
Broad Support for Doron Clark
Stonewall DFL's endorsement joins the endorsement of AFSCME, Minnesota's second largest union; neighborhood presidents Jeffrey Kraker (Logan Park), Jeffrey Martin (Waite Park), and Wendy Menken (SE Como); and hundreds of supporters.
Click here to learn more about caucuses
including what to do if you cannot attend
You Can Help!
Doron's needs your help to win!
* Caucus for Clark on March 3rd at Northeast Middle School (7:00 pm)
* Become a volunteer! If you have 30 minutes, you can help. Email volunteer@DoronClark.com to help.
*
Facebook Fan Page
* Donate!Can you help today with a gift of $30, $60, or even $300?
www.DoronClark.com
Prepared & Paid for by Neighbors for Doron Clark; Dean DeGroot, Treasurer
1914 Ulysses St. NE
Minneapolis, MN 55418
Friday, February 27, 2009
Take Action Minnesota City Council Candidate Screening
1821 University Avenue W, Suite S-137
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55104
Tel: (651) 641-6199 Fax: (651) 645-1311
www.TakeActionMinnesota.org
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
February 27, 2009
For Information Contact:
Greta Bergstrom
(c) 651-336-6722; (o) 651-379-0765
Greta@takeactionminnesota.org
TakeAction Minnesota To Hold 2009 Candidate Screenings
For Minneapolis City Council Races
(St. Paul, MN) February 26, 2009 – In early March, TakeAction Minnesota will be holding candidate screenings for endorsement in four competitive Minneapolis City Council contests. All current members, as well as individuals wishing to become members of TakeAction Minnesota, are invited to attend and participate in the endorsement selection process.
In 2005, the last year the Minneapolis City Council was on the ballot, TakeAction Minnesota had a perfect record of endorsements. All council candidates that had been endorsed by the organization (called Progressive Minnesota at the time) went on to win their respective races – including highly competitive contests in Ward 8 (Elizabeth Glidden), Ward 10 (Ralph Remington), and Ward 13 (Betsy Hodges).
TakeAction Minnesota strives to create deep, accountable democracy within our organization and with elected officials. Candidates screenings are an integral part of that process. Members hear from City Council candidates about their vision for social, racial, and economic justice in Minneapolis and vote on which candidates TakeAction Minnesota should endorse.
This year, TakeAction Minnesota’s PAC Board has made the decision to endorse in four council races that are considered to be hotly contested. These include the races in Ward 1 and Ward 10, in which council-members have decided to step down (Paul Ostrow and Ralph Remington, respectively) and which have created open seats. They also include Ward 5 (Don Samuels, incumbent) and Ward 2 (Cam Gordon, incumbent) which are also expected to be competitive. TakeAction Minnesota will also be endorsing later in Ward 6, Ward 8, Ward 11 and Ward 13.
Screenings will take place on two separate Monday evenings in March, as follows:
Wards 5 (North Mpls) and Ward 10 (Uptown)
When: Monday, March 9th, 6:00pm-8:30pm
Where: Harrison Recreation Center
503 Irving Avenue North, Minneapolis
(same bldg as Harrison Education Center—park in back—enter Rec Center
on park side of bldg)
*Deadline for member registration, to vote, is 5pm Monday, March 2
Wards 1 (Northeast) and Ward 2 (Seward, Cedar-Riverside, Prospect Park)
When: Thursday, March 19th, 6:00pm-8:30pm
Where: Logan Park Recreation Center
690 13th Avenue NE, Minneapolis
* Deadline for member registration, to vote, is 5pm Thursday, March 12
The candidate screenings are open to anyone joining TakeAction Minnesota by 5:00 PM on the day one week before the screening date – 5:00PM Monday, March 2 for Ward 5 and Ward 10, and 5:00pm Thursday, March 12 for Ward 1 and Ward 2. Every member joining by the previous week deadline can vote on candidate endorsements in any Ward, regardless of where the member lives.
To RSVP for one or both dates, or to obtain more information -- including complete screening rules – please visit TakeActionMinnesota.org. For additional questions related to the screening process, please contact Ryan Greenwood at 651-379-0742 or by email at Ryan@takeactionminnesota.org
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55104
Tel: (651) 641-6199 Fax: (651) 645-1311
www.TakeActionMinnesota.org
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
February 27, 2009
For Information Contact:
Greta Bergstrom
(c) 651-336-6722; (o) 651-379-0765
Greta@takeactionminnesota.org
TakeAction Minnesota To Hold 2009 Candidate Screenings
For Minneapolis City Council Races
(St. Paul, MN) February 26, 2009 – In early March, TakeAction Minnesota will be holding candidate screenings for endorsement in four competitive Minneapolis City Council contests. All current members, as well as individuals wishing to become members of TakeAction Minnesota, are invited to attend and participate in the endorsement selection process.
In 2005, the last year the Minneapolis City Council was on the ballot, TakeAction Minnesota had a perfect record of endorsements. All council candidates that had been endorsed by the organization (called Progressive Minnesota at the time) went on to win their respective races – including highly competitive contests in Ward 8 (Elizabeth Glidden), Ward 10 (Ralph Remington), and Ward 13 (Betsy Hodges).
TakeAction Minnesota strives to create deep, accountable democracy within our organization and with elected officials. Candidates screenings are an integral part of that process. Members hear from City Council candidates about their vision for social, racial, and economic justice in Minneapolis and vote on which candidates TakeAction Minnesota should endorse.
This year, TakeAction Minnesota’s PAC Board has made the decision to endorse in four council races that are considered to be hotly contested. These include the races in Ward 1 and Ward 10, in which council-members have decided to step down (Paul Ostrow and Ralph Remington, respectively) and which have created open seats. They also include Ward 5 (Don Samuels, incumbent) and Ward 2 (Cam Gordon, incumbent) which are also expected to be competitive. TakeAction Minnesota will also be endorsing later in Ward 6, Ward 8, Ward 11 and Ward 13.
Screenings will take place on two separate Monday evenings in March, as follows:
Wards 5 (North Mpls) and Ward 10 (Uptown)
When: Monday, March 9th, 6:00pm-8:30pm
Where: Harrison Recreation Center
503 Irving Avenue North, Minneapolis
(same bldg as Harrison Education Center—park in back—enter Rec Center
on park side of bldg)
*Deadline for member registration, to vote, is 5pm Monday, March 2
Wards 1 (Northeast) and Ward 2 (Seward, Cedar-Riverside, Prospect Park)
When: Thursday, March 19th, 6:00pm-8:30pm
Where: Logan Park Recreation Center
690 13th Avenue NE, Minneapolis
* Deadline for member registration, to vote, is 5pm Thursday, March 12
The candidate screenings are open to anyone joining TakeAction Minnesota by 5:00 PM on the day one week before the screening date – 5:00PM Monday, March 2 for Ward 5 and Ward 10, and 5:00pm Thursday, March 12 for Ward 1 and Ward 2. Every member joining by the previous week deadline can vote on candidate endorsements in any Ward, regardless of where the member lives.
To RSVP for one or both dates, or to obtain more information -- including complete screening rules – please visit TakeActionMinnesota.org. For additional questions related to the screening process, please contact Ryan Greenwood at 651-379-0742 or by email at Ryan@takeactionminnesota.org
Lastest Clark Email
4 Days Until Caucuses at Northeast Middle School
Turning Heads in Ward 1
Community Support
Doron Clark logo
In this week's Northeaster newspaper, Northeast resident Roberta Lundorff explained why she plans to support Doron Clark for Ward 1 City Council at the March 3rd caucuses.
"On March 3rd DFL members will convene the 2009 precinct caucuses. One particularly important race is the City Council race in Ward 1. As I go to caucus I am looking for a candidate who will create an atmosphere for new job growth and economic expansion; these are critical to the future stability of our City.
After spending considerable time canvassing the websites of the announced candidates I have come to discover that only Doron Clark has brought these issues to the forefront of his campaign. Not only has Doron Clark identified these needs; he has also taken the next step and provided a vision to accomplish this goal." - Roberta Lundorff, Northeast Minneapolis
Neighborhood Leaders Support
The presidents of Waite Park, Logan Park, and Southeast Como all endorse Doron Clark for Ward 1. They work closely with Doron and know that Doron will build on his work in Windom Park by fighting for our neighborhoods.
Labor Support
AFSCME, Minnesota's second largest union, agrees that Doron Clark is the best pick for Ward 1. As AFSCME's endorsed candidate, AFSCME knows that Doron's plans for Minneapolis support working families and help small businesses.
Click here to learn more about caucuses
including what to do if you cannot attend
You Can Help!
Doron's needs your help to win!
* Phone Bank Sunday afternoon: email Volunteer@DoronClark.com or call 612.987.8142 to help
* Caucus for Clark on March 3rd at Northeast Middle School (7:00 pm)
* Become a volunteer! If you have 30 minutes, you can help. Email volunteer@DoronClark.com to help.
*
Facebook Fan Page
* Donate! Doron is almost to his $1000 February goal. Can you put him over the top today with a gift of $30, $60, or $100?
www.DoronClark.com
Prepared & Paid for by Neighbors for Doron Clark; Dean DeGroot, Treasurer
1914 Ulysses St. NE
Minneapolis, MN 55418
Turning Heads in Ward 1
Community Support
Doron Clark logo
In this week's Northeaster newspaper, Northeast resident Roberta Lundorff explained why she plans to support Doron Clark for Ward 1 City Council at the March 3rd caucuses.
"On March 3rd DFL members will convene the 2009 precinct caucuses. One particularly important race is the City Council race in Ward 1. As I go to caucus I am looking for a candidate who will create an atmosphere for new job growth and economic expansion; these are critical to the future stability of our City.
After spending considerable time canvassing the websites of the announced candidates I have come to discover that only Doron Clark has brought these issues to the forefront of his campaign. Not only has Doron Clark identified these needs; he has also taken the next step and provided a vision to accomplish this goal." - Roberta Lundorff, Northeast Minneapolis
Neighborhood Leaders Support
The presidents of Waite Park, Logan Park, and Southeast Como all endorse Doron Clark for Ward 1. They work closely with Doron and know that Doron will build on his work in Windom Park by fighting for our neighborhoods.
Labor Support
AFSCME, Minnesota's second largest union, agrees that Doron Clark is the best pick for Ward 1. As AFSCME's endorsed candidate, AFSCME knows that Doron's plans for Minneapolis support working families and help small businesses.
Click here to learn more about caucuses
including what to do if you cannot attend
You Can Help!
Doron's needs your help to win!
* Phone Bank Sunday afternoon: email Volunteer@DoronClark.com or call 612.987.8142 to help
* Caucus for Clark on March 3rd at Northeast Middle School (7:00 pm)
* Become a volunteer! If you have 30 minutes, you can help. Email volunteer@DoronClark.com to help.
*
Facebook Fan Page
* Donate! Doron is almost to his $1000 February goal. Can you put him over the top today with a gift of $30, $60, or $100?
www.DoronClark.com
Prepared & Paid for by Neighbors for Doron Clark; Dean DeGroot, Treasurer
1914 Ulysses St. NE
Minneapolis, MN 55418
Thursday, February 26, 2009
More Facebook--Kevin Reich
If you're at all computer dependent, facebook is probably one of the best ways to keep up with the candidates:
I Like Reich For Northeast
To link the community and build the coalition to elect neighborhood organizer Kevin Reich to the Minneapolis City Council, Ward 1, for Northeast’s greater overall public benefit.
Positions:
1. Progressive
2. Community Empowerment
3. Vision & Experience
4. Neighborhood Revitalization
5. www.reich4ne.com
Category:
Political Campaigns
Description:
Kevin Reich has spent the last 20 years dedicated to neighborhood and community development. He is an organizer and advocate of citizen outreach and participation, education and youth service programs, with an impassioned emphasis for NE Minneapolis.
The First Ward is a vibrant and diverse City Council ward in Minneapolis with a very active commercial corridor along Central Avenue, where many ethnic restaurants and emerging businesses line the street, showing how a new influx of people to NE Minneapolis are reshaping the neighborhood. Ward 1 includes the neighborhoods of Columbia Park, Waite Park, Marshall Terrace, Audubon Park, Holland, Windom Park, Logan Park, Northeast Park, Mid-City Industrial, and a small part of the northern Como neighborhood.
There could be no better fit for such a diverse ward than Kevin Reich who has committed his public life to community organization and neighborhood advocacy. Kevin’s adult life has been spent bringing people together – whether it is advocating for a better business climate or building bridges through consensus and dialog, he has ensured that all voices are heard. His philosophy is one of a holistic and integrated approach to governance and community partnerships, resulting in resource efficiency and greater overall public benefit.
Born and raised in the working class neighborhoods of NE Minneapolis, Kevin Reich graduated from Edison Senior High School and then St. Olaf College in 1994 with a Bachelor of Arts in both Philosophy and Asian Studies. He spent several years in Asia as a teacher, trainer, and writer of educational materials, and then moved to back to Minnesota to attend graduate school for Public Administration at Hamline University in St. Paul. He and his partner Cindy, the Director of Marketing for the Minnesota Orchestra, have since made NE Minneapolis their home where they are raising Kevin’s daughter, Oshana.
Upon returning to his origins in NE Minneapolis, Kevin has spent the last eight years as the Project Director of Holland Neighborhood Improvement Association, where he has gained extensive experience in strategic planning, budget and contract oversight, and project direction. He became a strong advocate for neighborhood participation, and was an Eastside Food Co-op founding Board Member and Site Planning Project Chair. Every day Kevin works with all levels of local government (County, City, School and Park Boards) to direct resources, programming and projects for the betterment of NE Minneapolis.
Kevin announced his intentions to seek the open Ward 1 City Council seat as a natural extension of his proven service to the communities of NE Minneapolis. He has quickly established himself as a formidable candidate and is seeking the DFL party endorsement on March 3rd in a multi-candidate field.
For many years, Kevin Reich served the Windom Park Neighborhood Association as their Board of Directors Co-chair, and currently serves as their Community Land Use & Planning Committee Chair. He is also a PEACE Foundation Co-founder and Vice President where his efforts have focused on youth involvement and crime prevention. Kevin Reich also currently serves on the Edison Community and Sports Foundation Board of Directors.
Find Kevin on Facebook here: http://www.facebook.com/profile....
I Like Reich For Northeast
To link the community and build the coalition to elect neighborhood organizer Kevin Reich to the Minneapolis City Council, Ward 1, for Northeast’s greater overall public benefit.
Positions:
1. Progressive
2. Community Empowerment
3. Vision & Experience
4. Neighborhood Revitalization
5. www.reich4ne.com
Category:
Political Campaigns
Description:
Kevin Reich has spent the last 20 years dedicated to neighborhood and community development. He is an organizer and advocate of citizen outreach and participation, education and youth service programs, with an impassioned emphasis for NE Minneapolis.
The First Ward is a vibrant and diverse City Council ward in Minneapolis with a very active commercial corridor along Central Avenue, where many ethnic restaurants and emerging businesses line the street, showing how a new influx of people to NE Minneapolis are reshaping the neighborhood. Ward 1 includes the neighborhoods of Columbia Park, Waite Park, Marshall Terrace, Audubon Park, Holland, Windom Park, Logan Park, Northeast Park, Mid-City Industrial, and a small part of the northern Como neighborhood.
There could be no better fit for such a diverse ward than Kevin Reich who has committed his public life to community organization and neighborhood advocacy. Kevin’s adult life has been spent bringing people together – whether it is advocating for a better business climate or building bridges through consensus and dialog, he has ensured that all voices are heard. His philosophy is one of a holistic and integrated approach to governance and community partnerships, resulting in resource efficiency and greater overall public benefit.
Born and raised in the working class neighborhoods of NE Minneapolis, Kevin Reich graduated from Edison Senior High School and then St. Olaf College in 1994 with a Bachelor of Arts in both Philosophy and Asian Studies. He spent several years in Asia as a teacher, trainer, and writer of educational materials, and then moved to back to Minnesota to attend graduate school for Public Administration at Hamline University in St. Paul. He and his partner Cindy, the Director of Marketing for the Minnesota Orchestra, have since made NE Minneapolis their home where they are raising Kevin’s daughter, Oshana.
Upon returning to his origins in NE Minneapolis, Kevin has spent the last eight years as the Project Director of Holland Neighborhood Improvement Association, where he has gained extensive experience in strategic planning, budget and contract oversight, and project direction. He became a strong advocate for neighborhood participation, and was an Eastside Food Co-op founding Board Member and Site Planning Project Chair. Every day Kevin works with all levels of local government (County, City, School and Park Boards) to direct resources, programming and projects for the betterment of NE Minneapolis.
Kevin announced his intentions to seek the open Ward 1 City Council seat as a natural extension of his proven service to the communities of NE Minneapolis. He has quickly established himself as a formidable candidate and is seeking the DFL party endorsement on March 3rd in a multi-candidate field.
For many years, Kevin Reich served the Windom Park Neighborhood Association as their Board of Directors Co-chair, and currently serves as their Community Land Use & Planning Committee Chair. He is also a PEACE Foundation Co-founder and Vice President where his efforts have focused on youth involvement and crime prevention. Kevin Reich also currently serves on the Edison Community and Sports Foundation Board of Directors.
Find Kevin on Facebook here: http://www.facebook.com/profile....
Via Facebook -- Meet Doron Clark
Host:
Neighbors for Doron Clark
Type:
Meetings - Informational Meeting
Network:
Global
Date:
Friday, February 27, 2009
Time:
7:00pm - 9:00pm
Location:
Como Student Community Cooperative (U of M Family & Partnered Housing) - Community Room (2nd Floor)
Street:
1024 27th Avenue SE
City/Town:
Minneapolis, MN
:
View Map
Google
MapQuest
Microsoft
Yahoo
Phone:
6129878142
Email:
events@DoronClark.com
Neighbors for Doron Clark
Type:
Meetings - Informational Meeting
Network:
Global
Date:
Friday, February 27, 2009
Time:
7:00pm - 9:00pm
Location:
Como Student Community Cooperative (U of M Family & Partnered Housing) - Community Room (2nd Floor)
Street:
1024 27th Avenue SE
City/Town:
Minneapolis, MN
:
View Map
MapQuest
Microsoft
Yahoo
Phone:
6129878142
Email:
events@DoronClark.com
Latest Velez Email
Moving Northeast Forward
Jose Velez receives endorsements from the
Operating Engineers local 49 and the DFL Latino Caucus.
To find out more, visit our website www.josevelez.org or click here to read the Northeastbeat article.
Please join me to caucus at 7:00 p.m. on March 3rd at Northeast Middle School, 2955 Hayes St NE, and together, we can keep Northeast Minneapolis moving forward.
Prepared and paid for by Citizens for Velez. Chris Gams, Treasurer, www.josevelez.org.
Jose Velez receives endorsements from the
Operating Engineers local 49 and the DFL Latino Caucus.
To find out more, visit our website www.josevelez.org or click here to read the Northeastbeat article.
Please join me to caucus at 7:00 p.m. on March 3rd at Northeast Middle School, 2955 Hayes St NE, and together, we can keep Northeast Minneapolis moving forward.
Prepared and paid for by Citizens for Velez. Chris Gams, Treasurer, www.josevelez.org.
Caucus Info
Minneapolis DFL Party Precinct Caucuses Set for March 3
Neighborhood gatherings begin endorsement process for city council, mayor and park board
MINNEAPOLIS, Feb. 9, 2009 - Minneapolis residents will gather Tuesday, March 3, for precinct caucuses throughout the city that mark the start of the DFL Party's endorsing process for all city council and park board seats and for mayor.
Precinct caucuses serve as the official kick-off for getting involved in the Minneapolis DFL political process for 2009. All 13 city council seats, all 9 park board positions, 2 Board of Estimate and Taxation seats, and the mayor's office are up for election this November.
Caucuses, which will take place for all 131 of the city's precincts, begin at 7 p.m. at area schools, parks and other accessible neighborhood sites. All those who live in the precinct, who agree to support the DFL party's principles, and who will be of voting age by Election Day on Nov. 3, 2009, are eligible to attend their neighborhood caucus and vie for delegate positions.
Delegates and alternates elected at the precinct caucuses will attend Ward Conventions, to be held from March 14 through April 28. A total of 4,770 delegates will be selected. The 13 separate ward conventions will endorse DFL candidates for their respective city council seats.
In addition, a second set of 1,244 delegates will be elected at the March 3 precinct caucuses to attend the City Convention Saturday, May 16, at 10 a.m. The purpose of that convention, to be held at Washburn High School (201 W. 49th St.), is to endorse DFL candidates for mayor, park board and Board of Estimate and Taxation.
A complete list of precinct caucus and ward convention locations can be found at http://minneapolis.dflers.org. Those unable to attend the March 3 precinct caucuses who still wish to be considered for a delegate position may provide a letter to their precinct caucus. A sample letter is available at http://minneapolis.dflers.org.
Caucus and convention business also includes seeking volunteers for Minneapolis DFL
committees and party officer positions.
Neighborhood gatherings begin endorsement process for city council, mayor and park board
MINNEAPOLIS, Feb. 9, 2009 - Minneapolis residents will gather Tuesday, March 3, for precinct caucuses throughout the city that mark the start of the DFL Party's endorsing process for all city council and park board seats and for mayor.
Precinct caucuses serve as the official kick-off for getting involved in the Minneapolis DFL political process for 2009. All 13 city council seats, all 9 park board positions, 2 Board of Estimate and Taxation seats, and the mayor's office are up for election this November.
Caucuses, which will take place for all 131 of the city's precincts, begin at 7 p.m. at area schools, parks and other accessible neighborhood sites. All those who live in the precinct, who agree to support the DFL party's principles, and who will be of voting age by Election Day on Nov. 3, 2009, are eligible to attend their neighborhood caucus and vie for delegate positions.
Delegates and alternates elected at the precinct caucuses will attend Ward Conventions, to be held from March 14 through April 28. A total of 4,770 delegates will be selected. The 13 separate ward conventions will endorse DFL candidates for their respective city council seats.
In addition, a second set of 1,244 delegates will be elected at the March 3 precinct caucuses to attend the City Convention Saturday, May 16, at 10 a.m. The purpose of that convention, to be held at Washburn High School (201 W. 49th St.), is to endorse DFL candidates for mayor, park board and Board of Estimate and Taxation.
A complete list of precinct caucus and ward convention locations can be found at http://minneapolis.dflers.org. Those unable to attend the March 3 precinct caucuses who still wish to be considered for a delegate position may provide a letter to their precinct caucus. A sample letter is available at http://minneapolis.dflers.org.
Caucus and convention business also includes seeking volunteers for Minneapolis DFL
committees and party officer positions.
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
Mpls City Council Ward 1 -- Susan Howitz Hanna - 1st impressions
Susan Howitz Hanna was actually at a bit of a disadvantage. Due to a scheduling problem I was unable to meet her face to face, and we had to talk by phone. However, she already had a distinct advantage with me, as I love female candidates. I found the choice between Clinton and Obama difficult to make for a very long time. And when I hit the section on a ballot that contains judges, comptrollers and water supervisory and the like, I'll admit that if I'm at a loss I'll look for the women.
She was harder for me to wrap my head around than the previous two candidates. I like to go into my talks knowing key issues, background info and the likes. I adore candidate websites. I consider them a glimspe into the candidates' souls.
With Howitz Hanna I had to fly blind. She told me she had only decided this weekend to run, after receiving numerous phonecalls and emails from supporters asking her to throw her hat in the ring. Probably because of this late entry she seemed much less prepared to me to discuss what she was ready to focus on in the neighborhood. When I asked her about the pressing "quick hit" proposal she'd enact right off if elected, she said she'd focus on making sure none of the city services we've come to rely on are cut in the wake of budget cutbacks.
But her enthusiasm for the ward was obvious. As a native Nordeasterner, she wanted to be sure the communities were livable and the housing inventory beginning to build up locally is seen and sold. She discussed neighborhood programs like those in North that involve small businesses and realtors promoting their neighborhoods, doing tours and the like.
Combined with her focus on trying to get businesses to move back into the vacant industrial buildings in the neighborhoods, Howitz Hanna described a plan she hopes will bring more residents back into the area, bringing people closer to their jobs. She said she believes that communities are trending smaller and people will want to live where they can ride or walk to work.
I asked her what she thought would be her biggest strength as a candidate, and she explained that it would be her ability to see and represent the overall picture -- that she would represent not just the people who go to websites for information and attend all of the neighborhood meetings, but also the people who just work and pay their taxes, but need to have a voice, too. She said she would work hard to make sure that all groups have an equal voice.
It was obvious that her campaign was only a few days old, and yet to find its footing. But Susan Howitz Hanna was engaging to speak with and again, I'm always drawn to a female candidate.
Friday I will be talking with Kevin Reich, and I intend to make a decision sometime this weekend.
She was harder for me to wrap my head around than the previous two candidates. I like to go into my talks knowing key issues, background info and the likes. I adore candidate websites. I consider them a glimspe into the candidates' souls.
With Howitz Hanna I had to fly blind. She told me she had only decided this weekend to run, after receiving numerous phonecalls and emails from supporters asking her to throw her hat in the ring. Probably because of this late entry she seemed much less prepared to me to discuss what she was ready to focus on in the neighborhood. When I asked her about the pressing "quick hit" proposal she'd enact right off if elected, she said she'd focus on making sure none of the city services we've come to rely on are cut in the wake of budget cutbacks.
But her enthusiasm for the ward was obvious. As a native Nordeasterner, she wanted to be sure the communities were livable and the housing inventory beginning to build up locally is seen and sold. She discussed neighborhood programs like those in North that involve small businesses and realtors promoting their neighborhoods, doing tours and the like.
Combined with her focus on trying to get businesses to move back into the vacant industrial buildings in the neighborhoods, Howitz Hanna described a plan she hopes will bring more residents back into the area, bringing people closer to their jobs. She said she believes that communities are trending smaller and people will want to live where they can ride or walk to work.
I asked her what she thought would be her biggest strength as a candidate, and she explained that it would be her ability to see and represent the overall picture -- that she would represent not just the people who go to websites for information and attend all of the neighborhood meetings, but also the people who just work and pay their taxes, but need to have a voice, too. She said she would work hard to make sure that all groups have an equal voice.
It was obvious that her campaign was only a few days old, and yet to find its footing. But Susan Howitz Hanna was engaging to speak with and again, I'm always drawn to a female candidate.
Friday I will be talking with Kevin Reich, and I intend to make a decision sometime this weekend.
Tuesday, February 24, 2009
Mpls City Council Ward 1 -- Jose Velez- 1st impressions
Today I had a chance to sit down with Jose Velez and ask him about his run for the Ward 1 DFL endorsement.
In many ways, Jose was much luckier than Doron Clark, as he got my undivided attention rather than a half-distracted baby wrangler. But he didn't get to talk to Smartie, so perhaps it balanced out.
The two candidates have a lot in common. Both have obvious pride in their city and their neighborhood. Both have a dedication to bike paths as part of their transit plans that still quite honestly befuddles me (can we please get the #11 to come more frequently, first?). But there were genuine differences between the two as well.
Velez was highly focused on the best ways to keep the neighborhood strong in the face of the plummeting real estate market. His ideas on rehabilitating troubled properties with more green and energy efficient materials combined with a possible apprentice program with children of color to learn to provide the labor seemed like a reasonable solution to deal with the two tier issue of blight properties and job creation. And I learned quite a bit about projects around the city that I had no idea were occurring, like the JAC Flats initiative.
But then there's the streetcars. I understand the appeal. I played on them in San Francisco. But I just don't know if I feel that streetcars can work here. A streetcar going up Central would be great for slowing folks down enough to see the wide array of businesses we have. But I sort of think of it like the bus on Nicollet Mall. People ride it to connect to other buses, they seldom just ride up and down to go to the shops themselves. I would like to see a light rail go from University and hook downtown. I feel that it would be much more useful.
Both candidates have definite strengths, and I think would make excellent city council members for their own reasons. I will go further what those are on Monday.
Tomorrow, I meet Susan Howitz Hanna, and Friday, Kevin Reich. So, more first impressions tomorrow.
In many ways, Jose was much luckier than Doron Clark, as he got my undivided attention rather than a half-distracted baby wrangler. But he didn't get to talk to Smartie, so perhaps it balanced out.
The two candidates have a lot in common. Both have obvious pride in their city and their neighborhood. Both have a dedication to bike paths as part of their transit plans that still quite honestly befuddles me (can we please get the #11 to come more frequently, first?). But there were genuine differences between the two as well.
Velez was highly focused on the best ways to keep the neighborhood strong in the face of the plummeting real estate market. His ideas on rehabilitating troubled properties with more green and energy efficient materials combined with a possible apprentice program with children of color to learn to provide the labor seemed like a reasonable solution to deal with the two tier issue of blight properties and job creation. And I learned quite a bit about projects around the city that I had no idea were occurring, like the JAC Flats initiative.
But then there's the streetcars. I understand the appeal. I played on them in San Francisco. But I just don't know if I feel that streetcars can work here. A streetcar going up Central would be great for slowing folks down enough to see the wide array of businesses we have. But I sort of think of it like the bus on Nicollet Mall. People ride it to connect to other buses, they seldom just ride up and down to go to the shops themselves. I would like to see a light rail go from University and hook downtown. I feel that it would be much more useful.
Both candidates have definite strengths, and I think would make excellent city council members for their own reasons. I will go further what those are on Monday.
Tomorrow, I meet Susan Howitz Hanna, and Friday, Kevin Reich. So, more first impressions tomorrow.
Local 49 endores Velez
release here
Adam E. Duininck
Legislative & Political Director
Int'l Union of Operating Engineers Local 49
(612) 877-3736 (D)
(612) 788-1936 (F)
aduininck@local49.org
www.local49.org
Operating Engineers Endorse Jose Velez for Ward 1 Minneapolis City Council Seat
Minneapolis – St Paul, Minnesota (February 24, 2009) The International Union of Operating Engineers Local 49 is proud to announce our endorsement of Jose Velez for Ward 1 Minneapolis City Council.
Our endorsement committee, comprised of both members and staff, voted unanimously to endorse Mr. Velez. Ultimately, the committee was swayed by Mr. Velez's deep-rooted passion and personal experience in the fight to advance the cause of working-class families.
Mr. Velez has personally experienced the issues facing working people in his community. He led the fight to organize his staff union in Chicago to change his deteriorating working conditions and was later elected president of that union.
He grew up in a union household, and he intimately understands the benefits to a family that a stable, well-paying job can provide. Mr. Velez's working-class background is just the kind of voice that we need now more than ever.
“Jose really demonstrated enthusiasm and a commitment to working people when he screened with us,” said Local 49 Political Director Adam Duininck. “He really connected with our members, and Jose left an impression that he is passionate, experienced, and running to fight for us.”
ABOUT LOCAL 49
Local 49 represents more than 13,000 Operating Engineers in Minnesota, South Dakota and North Dakota. This includes employees who work for the city of Minneapolis and the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board that repair our streets and bridges, plow our roads, and perform the duties required to maintain a good and safe city.
Adam E. Duininck
Legislative & Political Director
Int'l Union of Operating Engineers Local 49
(612) 877-3736 (D)
(612) 788-1936 (F)
aduininck@local49.org
www.local49.org
Operating Engineers Endorse Jose Velez for Ward 1 Minneapolis City Council Seat
Minneapolis – St Paul, Minnesota (February 24, 2009) The International Union of Operating Engineers Local 49 is proud to announce our endorsement of Jose Velez for Ward 1 Minneapolis City Council.
Our endorsement committee, comprised of both members and staff, voted unanimously to endorse Mr. Velez. Ultimately, the committee was swayed by Mr. Velez's deep-rooted passion and personal experience in the fight to advance the cause of working-class families.
Mr. Velez has personally experienced the issues facing working people in his community. He led the fight to organize his staff union in Chicago to change his deteriorating working conditions and was later elected president of that union.
He grew up in a union household, and he intimately understands the benefits to a family that a stable, well-paying job can provide. Mr. Velez's working-class background is just the kind of voice that we need now more than ever.
“Jose really demonstrated enthusiasm and a commitment to working people when he screened with us,” said Local 49 Political Director Adam Duininck. “He really connected with our members, and Jose left an impression that he is passionate, experienced, and running to fight for us.”
ABOUT LOCAL 49
Local 49 represents more than 13,000 Operating Engineers in Minnesota, South Dakota and North Dakota. This includes employees who work for the city of Minneapolis and the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board that repair our streets and bridges, plow our roads, and perform the duties required to maintain a good and safe city.
Susan Howitz Hanna confirmed in race
I'll be having coffee with her tomorrow. If you have questions, please leave a comment, send an email, or tweet me @robinmarty.
Late entry into Ward 1 endorsement race
I've just heard that Susan Howitz Hanna decided this weekend to jump into the race. I know nothing about her but what I found here.
I'll try to contact her and see what else I can learn.
Also, I still have not heard back from Kevin Reich.
Updated: She was also Ostrow's campaign treasurer.
Susan Howitz Hanna
Age: 49
Resume: Account manager for Qwest, former Ostrow campaign Treasurer, Minneapolis Civil Rights Commissioner.
Notes/Sites: Again is a potential candidate and doesn't have a site but has a strong resume. She says she'd like to see a strong female candidate and as the only rumored female candidate that could be her and could give her an edge.
I'll try to contact her and see what else I can learn.
Also, I still have not heard back from Kevin Reich.
Updated: She was also Ostrow's campaign treasurer.
Doron Clark latest email
(I'll have a post up about my coffee with Jose Velez later today, but for now, the latest email from the Clark campaign)
Neighbors for Doron Clark
Strong Neighborhoods
Quality Jobs
Responsive Leadership
Caucus for Clark on March 3rd
Doron Clark logo
Caucuses are coming!
On Tuesday March 3rd at 7:00 pm, neighbors in Ward 1 will gather at the Northeast Middle School (2955 Hayes St. NE) to select delegates to the April 4 Ward 1 Convention. The delegates will determine who earns the DFL endorsement in the race for Ward 1 City Council.
Doron needs you to Caucus for Clark on March 3rd to become a Delegate for Doron at the Ward 1 Convention.
How do I become a delegate?
In most precincts, you will simply need to volunteer by raising your hand. Occasionally, you will be asked to introduce yourself by sharing your name and how you are involved in the neighborhood. These folks are your neighbors, let them know who you are!
If you can't attend on March 3rd, call 612.987.8142 or email volunteer@DoronClark.com and a volunteer supporting Doron Clark will provide an absentee form for you to support Doron despite your absence.
After I become a delegate, what happens next ?
Mark your calendar for April 4th. The Ward 1 endorsing convention will meet at 10:00 on April 4th and delegates will select the DFL endorsed candidate for Ward 1.
Never been to a caucus?
Caucuses last about an hour and are a great way to meet your neighbors.
Caucus training occurs Thursday February 26th at 7:30 pm at Windom Park (2251 Hayes St. NE). Learn the easy way to caucus and support Doron Clark.
You Can Help!
Doron has a very competitive race and needs your help to win!
* Caucus for Clark on March 3rd at Northeast Middle School (7:00 pm)
* Become a volunteer! If you have 30 minutes, you can help. Email volunteer@DoronClark.com to help.
*
Facebook Group
* Donate! Doron is halfway to his $1000 February goal. Can you help today?
www.DoronClark.com
Prepared & Paid for by Neighbors for Doron Clark; Dean DeGroot, Treasurer
1914 Ulysses St. NE
Minneapolis, MN 55418
Neighbors for Doron Clark
Strong Neighborhoods
Quality Jobs
Responsive Leadership
Caucus for Clark on March 3rd
Doron Clark logo
Caucuses are coming!
On Tuesday March 3rd at 7:00 pm, neighbors in Ward 1 will gather at the Northeast Middle School (2955 Hayes St. NE) to select delegates to the April 4 Ward 1 Convention. The delegates will determine who earns the DFL endorsement in the race for Ward 1 City Council.
Doron needs you to Caucus for Clark on March 3rd to become a Delegate for Doron at the Ward 1 Convention.
How do I become a delegate?
In most precincts, you will simply need to volunteer by raising your hand. Occasionally, you will be asked to introduce yourself by sharing your name and how you are involved in the neighborhood. These folks are your neighbors, let them know who you are!
If you can't attend on March 3rd, call 612.987.8142 or email volunteer@DoronClark.com and a volunteer supporting Doron Clark will provide an absentee form for you to support Doron despite your absence.
After I become a delegate, what happens next ?
Mark your calendar for April 4th. The Ward 1 endorsing convention will meet at 10:00 on April 4th and delegates will select the DFL endorsed candidate for Ward 1.
Never been to a caucus?
Caucuses last about an hour and are a great way to meet your neighbors.
Caucus training occurs Thursday February 26th at 7:30 pm at Windom Park (2251 Hayes St. NE). Learn the easy way to caucus and support Doron Clark.
You Can Help!
Doron has a very competitive race and needs your help to win!
* Caucus for Clark on March 3rd at Northeast Middle School (7:00 pm)
* Become a volunteer! If you have 30 minutes, you can help. Email volunteer@DoronClark.com to help.
*
Facebook Group
* Donate! Doron is halfway to his $1000 February goal. Can you help today?
www.DoronClark.com
Prepared & Paid for by Neighbors for Doron Clark; Dean DeGroot, Treasurer
1914 Ulysses St. NE
Minneapolis, MN 55418
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
